Modifier 24: The Complete 2026 Guide for Healthcare Providers

Every year, practices leave thousands of dollars on the table because they miss legitimate Modifier 24 opportunities. Or worse, they use the 24 modifier incorrectly and trigger denials, audits, and recoupment demands. If you've ever watched revenue slip away during a patient's post-op period, you know exactly how frustrating this gets.

At MedSole RCM, we review thousands of modifier-related claims every month. Modifier 24 consistently ranks in our top five most misunderstood modifiers in medical billing. But here's the thing: it's also one of the most profitable when you use it correctly.

Modifier 24 is defined as an "unrelated evaluation and management service by the same physician during a postoperative period." In plain terms, it lets you bill separately for E/M visits during a patient's global period when the reason for the visit has nothing to do with their surgery.

This guide covers everything healthcare providers need to know: when to use Modifier 24, when to avoid it, specialty-specific examples, documentation requirements, and proven denial prevention strategies. It reflects the January 1, 2026 CMS NCCI Policy Manual updates, including critical changes to global surgery auditing.

Let's start with the basics.

What Is Modifier 24? Definition for Healthcare Providers

The Official CMS Definition (Plain English)

CMS defines CPT Modifier 24 as indicating "an unrelated evaluation and management service by the same physician or other qualified health care professional during a postoperative period."

Let me translate that into plain English. Modifier 24 indicates that an evaluation and management (E/M) service performed during a postoperative period is completely unrelated to the original surgery. It tells payers: "Yes, this patient had surgery recently. But today's visit has nothing to do with that procedure."

The modifier applies only to E/M codes. You can't append it to procedures, lab work, or imaging. It's specifically designed for office visits, hospital visits, and other evaluation services that fall within the global surgical window.

Here's what trips people up: the modifier doesn't change what you bill. It changes how the payer processes the claim. Without it, automated systems flag the visit as routine post-op care and deny payment.

Why Modifier 24 Exists (The Business Case for Providers)

When a surgeon performs a procedure, the payment includes a global surgical package. That package bundles the surgery itself plus a specific number of follow-up days. Minor procedures get 10 days. Major surgeries get 90.

During that window, payers expect surgeons to provide routine post-op care at no additional charge. Wound checks, suture removal, medication adjustments related to the surgery: all included in the original fee.

But patients don't stop getting sick just because they had surgery. A knee replacement patient can still catch the flu. Someone recovering from cataract surgery can develop a UTI. Without Modifier 24, you're leaving money on the table for legitimate unrelated care that deserves separate reimbursement.

Quick Reference: Modifier 24 at a Glance

So what is Modifier 24 in daily practice? The 24 modifier description becomes clear once you see it mapped out:

Understanding the Modifier 24 definition helps you spot opportunities your practice might be missing. Every time a post-op patient comes in for something unrelated and you skip this modifier, that's revenue walking out the door.

Understanding Global Surgical Periods and How Modifier 24 Fits In

What Is a Global Surgical Period?

A global surgical period is the timeframe after surgery during which all related follow-up care is included in the original surgical fee. Payers don't pay separately for post-op visits during this window. They consider routine follow-up part of the surgery itself.

Think of it like buying a car with free oil changes for the first year. Those oil changes aren't really free; they're built into the purchase price. Same concept here. When payers reimburse a procedure, they're bundling the expected aftercare into that single payment.

That's why you can't bill separately for suture removal, wound checks, or pain management related to the surgery. Those services are already paid for. The global surgical period exists because payers don't want to pay twice for the same episode of care.

0-Day, 10-Day, and 90-Day Global Periods Explained

Not every procedure has the same follow-up window. CMS assigns global periods based on procedure complexity and expected recovery time. Here's the breakdown:

The 10-day global period covers most minor surgical procedures. You'll see this with simple excisions, incision and drainage, and straightforward repairs. During those 10 days, related E/M visits don't get separate payment.

The 90-day global period applies to major surgeries. It actually starts the day before surgery and extends 90 days after. That's 92 total days where related follow-up is bundled in.

Here's where global period modifier 24 becomes essential. When a patient in either a 10-day global period or 90-day global period comes in for something unrelated to their surgery, Modifier 24 unlocks separate payment. Without it, the claim denies automatically.

How to Look Up Global Periods for Any CPT Code

Before billing any E/M during a patient's post-op window, verify the global surgical period for their procedure. You can find this information in the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule lookup tool on the CMS website.

Look for the "Global Days" column. You'll see indicators like:

• XXX: Global period concept doesn't apply
• 000: Zero-day global (endoscopic procedures, minor services)
• 010: 10-day global period
• 090: 90-day global period

Make this a standard step in your workflow. Knowing the global period upfront helps you catch Modifier 24 opportunities before they slip through the cracks.

When to Use Modifier 24: 5 Criteria That Must Be Met

The 5 Essential Criteria for Modifier 24

Knowing when to use Modifier 24 comes down to five specific criteria. All five must be true for the modifier to apply correctly. Miss one, and you're looking at a denial.

✅ Modifier 24 Checklist: All 5 Must Be TRUE

1. Unrelated Condition: The E/M service addresses a problem completely separate from the prior surgery
2. Same Provider: Service provided by the same physician or same specialty/same group
3. During Global Period: Visit occurs after surgery but within the global window (10 or 90 days)
4. E/M Code Only: Modifier 24 applies ONLY to E/M codes, not procedures
5. Strong Documentation: Clear documentation with a DIFFERENT diagnosis code

Let me break down each one.

Unrelated Condition means the reason for today's visit has nothing to do with the surgery. The patient isn't here for wound healing, post-op pain, or recovery questions. They're here for something completely different.

Same Provider is where people get confused. The 24 modifier only matters when the visit is with the same physician who did the surgery, or someone in the same specialty within the same group. Different specialty, different group? You don't need it.

During Global Period seems obvious, but I've seen practices forget to check. If the patient is outside the 10 or 90-day window, you'd just bill the E/M normally without any modifier.

E/M Code Only is non-negotiable. You can't append Modifier 24 to a procedure code. Unrelated procedures during the global period require Modifier 79 instead.

Strong Documentation is what actually gets you paid. Your notes must clearly show a separate diagnosis and distinct clinical reasoning for the visit.

The "Unrelated" Test: How to Determine If It Qualifies

Here's a simple mental test for how to use Modifier 24 correctly: Would this visit have happened even if the surgery never occurred?

If yes, you likely have a qualifying unrelated visit. If no, it's probably considered related post-op care.

Some scenarios are obvious. A patient recovering from knee replacement comes in with flu symptoms. Clearly unrelated. Someone in their cataract surgery global period develops a UTI. Also unrelated.

Other situations need more thought. Different body system usually means unrelated. Same body system requires careful documentation to prove the conditions are separate. A shoulder surgery patient returning for elbow pain? Probably unrelated, but document why. Same shoulder with new symptoms? That's a harder argument to make.

The key is clinical logic. Can you defend this as a completely independent issue? If the answer isn't obviously yes, strengthen your documentation before submitting.

Same Provider, Same Group: Understanding the 2026 Rules

Current modifier 24 guidelines treat physicians in the same specialty and same group as if they were the same person. This catches a lot of practices off guard.

Here's the scenario: your partner performs a hip replacement. Three weeks later, the patient sees you for an unrelated problem. You didn't do the surgery. But if you share the same specialty taxonomy and practice under the same tax ID, payers view you as the "same physician."

That means you still need Modifier 24 for unrelated visits. Skipping it triggers a denial because the claim looks like routine post-op care from the surgical practice.

💡 Not sure if your claims qualify for Modifier 24? MedSole RCM's certified coders review modifier usage as part of our comprehensive claims review. [Learn about our billing audit services →]

When NOT to Use Modifier 24: 7 Common Mistakes to Avoid

7 Situations Where Modifier 24 Does NOT Apply

Understanding common mistakes modifier 24 creates saves you from denials and potential audits. Here are the seven situations where practices most often misuse this modifier:

Routine post-op visits are exactly what the global period covers. Follow-up appointments to check healing, review recovery progress, or answer post-surgical questions never qualify for separate payment.

Wound checks and suture removal count as expected aftercare. Payers built these services into the surgical fee from the start.

Surgical complications are the biggest trap. Just because the complication feels like a new problem doesn't make it unrelated. Wound infections, surgical site reactions, and unexpected pain all tie directly back to the procedure.

Pain at the surgical site is never unrelated, even weeks into recovery. If the complaint involves the body part that was operated on, you're looking at related care.

Same-day services require a different modifier entirely. If the E/M and procedure happen on the same date, you're evaluating Modifier 25, not Modifier 24.

Different provider scenarios don't need Modifier 24 at all. If the physician seeing the patient is a different specialty or different group from the surgeon, the global period doesn't apply to them.

Services outside the global period should be billed clean. Adding unnecessary modifiers just slows down processing or triggers unnecessary review.

The Complication Trap (2026 Audit Focus)

Complications are not unrelated care, even when they seem like entirely new problems. CMS views anything stemming from the surgery as part of the surgical episode.

Wound infections at the surgical site? Related. Allergic reaction to surgical materials? Related. Post-op fever requiring evaluation? Related. These scenarios feel like separate issues, but payers treat them as expected risks built into the global package.

There's one exception: if a complication requires a return to the operating room, you'd use Modifier 78 instead of Modifier 24. That modifier signals an unplanned return for a related procedure during the global period.

Avoid modifier 24 denials by being conservative with complications. When in doubt, assume it's related unless you can definitively prove otherwise.

Same-Day Services: Why Modifier 25 Applies Instead

Modifier 24 vs 25 comes down to timing. Modifier 24 applies when an unrelated E/M occurs on a different day during the global period. Modifier 25 applies when a significant, separately identifiable E/M happens on the same day as a procedure.

If the E/M and procedure occur on the same date of service, evaluate Modifier 25, not 24. These are distinct scenarios with different modifier requirements. Using the wrong one results in modifier 24 claim denials that could have been avoided with proper timing verification.

Modifier 24 Examples: Real-World Scenarios by Medical Specialty

Seeing modifier 24 examples in your specific specialty makes the concept click faster than any textbook definition. Here's how this plays out across different medical practices.

Orthopedic Surgery Examples

Example 1: Knee replacement patient with unrelated shoulder pain
Patient six weeks post knee replacement returns with new onset shoulder pain from a fall at home. ✅ Use Modifier 24 for the shoulder evaluation. Different joint, different mechanism of injury, completely unrelated to the knee surgery.

Example 2: Hip surgery patient needing diabetes management
Patient three weeks post hip surgery returns for diabetes follow-up: A1C check, medication adjustment, blood sugar review. ✅ Use Modifier 24 for diabetes management. The visit addresses a chronic condition that exists independently of the surgical episode.

Example 3: Knee surgery patient with knee swelling and pain
Patient four weeks post knee surgery returns with knee swelling and pain at the surgical site. ❌ Do NOT use Modifier 24. This is related post-op care, exactly what the global period covers. Bill nothing separately.

Cardiology Examples

Example 1: Cardiac catheterization patient with skin rash
Patient 30 days post cardiac catheterization returns with a new skin rash on their arms and legs. ✅ Use Modifier 24. The dermatologic complaint has no connection to the cardiac procedure.

Example 2: CABG patient with hypertension management
Patient 45 days post CABG returns for medication adjustment for pre-existing hypertension. ✅ Use Modifier 24 for chronic condition management unrelated to surgery. The patient had hypertension before surgery and will have it after the global period ends.

Ophthalmology Examples

Example 1: Cataract surgery with contralateral eye complaint
Patient two weeks post left eye cataract surgery returns with right eye irritation and redness. ✅ Use Modifier 24. Different eye equals unrelated condition. Document the laterality clearly in your notes.

Example 2: Post-op blurred vision in operated eye
Patient three weeks post cataract surgery returns with blurred vision in the operated eye. ❌ Do NOT use Modifier 24. This is directly related to surgery outcome and recovery. It's exactly the kind of follow-up included in the global package.

Dermatology Examples

Example 1: Lesion excision patient with acne flare
Patient five days post skin lesion excision on the back (10-day global) returns with unrelated acne flare-up on the face. ✅ Use Modifier 24 for acne treatment. Different condition, different anatomical location, unrelated clinical issue.

Wound Care Examples

Example 1: Debridement patient with COPD exacerbation
Patient in 90-day global period from debridement returns for unrelated COPD exacerbation requiring evaluation and treatment. ✅ Use Modifier 24. Respiratory issues have nothing to do with wound care procedures.

Pain Management Examples

Example 1: Spinal injection patient with new-level pain
Patient five days post lumbar spinal injection (L4-L5) returns with new neck pain at C5-C6. Carefully evaluate whether this qualifies. May warrant Modifier 24 if clearly unrelated anatomical region with distinct pathology. Document extensively.

Primary Care/Family Medicine Examples

Example 1: Surgical patient returning to PCP with flu
Patient referred back to PCP during surgeon's global period for flu symptoms. ✅ Use Modifier 24 if your practice shares the same tax ID and specialty as the surgeon (rare but possible in integrated health systems). Different specialty or different group? You don't need the modifier at all.

Managing claims across multiple specialties? MedSole RCM provides specialty-specific coding expertise for orthopedics, cardiology, ophthalmology, and 30+ specialties. [Explore our specialty billing services →]

Modifier 24 vs 25 vs 79 vs 57: Complete Comparison Guide

Understanding the difference between modifier 24 and 25, along with modifiers 57 and 79, prevents denials and speeds up claim processing. These four modifiers get mixed up constantly, but they serve distinct purposes.

Side-by-Side Comparison Table

Here's what separates these commonly confused modifiers:

Quick Decision Framework

Choosing the right modifier gets easier when you follow a simple decision path. Ask yourself three questions in order:

1. Is the service an E/M or a procedure?
   E/M codes (office visits, consultations, hospital visits) point you toward modifiers 24, 25, or 57. Procedures (surgeries, injections, therapeutic services) point you toward modifier 79.
2. Is the service on the same day as a procedure?
   Same-day services require either modifier 25 or 57. Different day during a global period? That's when modifier 24 comes into play.
3. Is the service related to the decision for major surgery?
   If yes, use modifier 57. This applies when the E/M service results in the decision to perform a 90-day global surgery. If no, choose between modifier 24 and 25 based on timing.

The modifier 24 vs 25 distinction really boils down to one question: same day or different day? Same day as a procedure equals modifier 25. Different day during a global period equals modifier 24.

Can You Bill Modifier 24 and 25 Together?

Yes, you can bill modifier 24 and 25 together, but it's rare and requires bulletproof documentation.

Here's the scenario where both modifiers apply: Patient in the global period of Surgery A comes in for an unrelated issue and receives a minor procedure for that new issue on the same day. The E/M for the new unrelated issue gets modifier 24 (unrelated to Surgery A). That same E/M also gets modifier 25 (same day as the new procedure).

Can we bill modifier 24 and 25 together on the same claim? Absolutely, when the clinical scenario supports it. But expect payers to scrutinize these claims closely. Your documentation needs to clearly establish the unrelated condition and justify a separately identifiable E/M on the same day as a procedure.

Modifier Sequencing: Which Goes First?

Modifier 24 goes first when you're using multiple modifiers together. AAPC guidance says the global period modifier takes priority in sequencing.

Edit systems process global period checks before other edits, so modifier 24 needs to appear first. The correct format is [E/M Code]-24-25, not -25-24. Getting the sequence wrong can trigger unnecessary denials or delay processing while payers manually review the claim.

Understanding modifier 24 and 79 helps too: modifier 24 is for unrelated E/M services, modifier 79 is for unrelated procedures. Same concept, different code types. Similarly, modifier 24 and 57 both apply to E/M codes, but modifier 57 specifically signals the decision for major surgery.

Staying compliant with modifier 24 in 2026 requires understanding several important changes. CMS has updated enforcement priorities, introduced new modifier distinctions, and tightened automated auditing processes.

CMS NCCI Policy Manual 2026: What Changed

Effective January 1, 2026, the CMS NCCI Policy Manual continues to classify Modifier 24 as a "global surgery modifier" and NCCI Procedure-to-Procedure (PTP) associated modifier. The core definition hasn't changed, but enforcement mechanisms have.

What's different is how payers detect and audit these claims. As of January 2026, AI-driven claim scrubbers now automatically flag modifier 24 claims for potential global period violations. The CMS modifier 24 guidelines emphasize that "the unrelated evaluation and management service must be clearly documented as separate from the original procedure."

Claims that previously sailed through manual review now face automated scrutiny. Payers are using predictive algorithms to identify patterns that suggest inappropriate modifier usage. If your documentation doesn't immediately prove the visit is unrelated, expect delays or denials.

The Modifier FT Distinction for Critical Care

Starting in 2025 and continuing through 2026, CMS introduced Modifier FT specifically for unrelated critical care services during the global period. This is a significant change for emergency and critical care billing.

If you're billing 99291 or 99292 (critical care codes) during a patient's global period for unrelated care, use Modifier FT instead of Modifier 24. The modifier 24 CMS guidance now explicitly excludes critical care services from standard E/M modifier 24 rules.

Using Modifier 24 for same-day critical care during a global period will likely result in denial. Payers' edit systems recognize this as incorrect coding under current modifier 24 guidelines.

The "Same Specialty" Audit Focus

2026 enforcement has tightened checks on same group and same specialty billing. Payers now automatically verify specialty taxonomy codes across providers within the same practice.

If you share the same specialty taxonomy with the surgeon who performed the procedure, you are treated as the "same physician" for global period purposes. Even if your partner did the surgery and you've never met the patient before, you still need Modifier 24 for unrelated visits during their global window.

This isn't new policy, but it's new enforcement intensity. Automated systems now cross-reference National Provider Identifier (NPI) data with tax ID and specialty codes instantly.

Diagnosis Code "Mismatch" Requirements

AI scrubbers in 2026 now flag diagnosis code overlap between surgical claims and subsequent E/M visits. The E/M diagnosis must be visibly different from the surgical diagnosis, or the claim triggers manual review.

Be hyper-specific with laterality when coding. Left knee surgery (M17.12) versus right ankle pain (M25.571) passes automated checks. Same body region with similar codes? You're looking at a 45-plus day delay while a human reviewer examines the claim.

⚠️ Worried about 2026 compliance? MedSole RCM stays current with every CMS update so you don't have to. Our coding team is already trained on January 2026 NCCI changes. [Request a compliance consultation →]

Documentation Requirements for Modifier 24: What Payers Need to See

Documentation makes or breaks modifier 24 claims. You can have the perfect scenario and still get denied if your notes don't clearly prove the visit is unrelated to surgery.

What Payers Look For in Modifier 24 Claims

Payers review modifier 24 documentation using a specific checklist. Your notes need to pass every item, or the claim gets flagged.

✅ Payer Documentation Checklist:

• Chief complaint clearly states NEW/SEPARATE condition
• Diagnosis code DIFFERENT from surgical diagnosis
• History section addresses the unrelated condition (not surgery recovery)
• Assessment/Plan focused on unrelated problem
• Explicit statement: "This visit is unrelated to [surgery name] performed on [date]"
• Medical necessity established for separate evaluation

The explicit statement of unrelatedness is what most practices skip. Payers want to see you actively acknowledge the global period and explain why this visit doesn't fall within it. Don't make them guess. State it directly in your documentation.

Medical necessity matters just as much as it does for any other E/M service. The modifier 24 claim needs clear justification for why the patient required a separate evaluation for this new condition.

Documentation Template for Modifier 24 Claims

Here's a documentation template you can adapt for your EHR system. This structure satisfies payer documentation requirements and speeds up claim processing:

text

MODIFIER 24 DOCUMENTATION TEMPLATE

Date of Visit: [Date]
Provider: [Name, credentials]

Chief Complaint: [Unrelated condition—NOT surgical follow-up]

Date of Prior Surgery: [Date]
Procedure Performed: [CPT Code + Description]
Global Period Status: Currently within [10/90]-day global period

STATEMENT OF UNRELATEDNESS:
"This evaluation and management service is for [condition],
which is completely unrelated to the [surgery name] performed
on [date]. The patient presents with [symptoms] that developed
independently of surgical recovery and requires separate
evaluation and management."

History of Present Illness: [Unrelated condition details]
Physical Exam: [Findings related to unrelated condition]
Assessment: [Unrelated diagnosis]
Plan: [Treatment for unrelated condition]

Diagnosis Code: [ICD-10 for unrelated condition]
Note: Distinct from surgical diagnosis [surgical ICD-10]

Copy this structure into your templates folder. Train your providers to use it whenever they see a patient in someone's global period for an unrelated issue.

ICD-10 Diagnosis Code Strategy

Diagnosis coding strategy for modifier 24 documentation centers on visible differentiation. The ICD-10 code on your E/M claim must look obviously different from the surgical diagnosis, or automated systems flag it for review.

Be hyper-specific with laterality when it applies. M25.561 (left knee pain) versus M25.562 (right knee pain) passes automated checks instantly. Same body system with similar codes? Expect delays while human reviewers examine the claim.

Best practice: document both the unrelated diagnosis and reference the original surgical diagnosis for contrast. This creates a clear comparison that proves the conditions are separate.

How to Prevent Modifier 24 Denials (and Win Appeals When They Happen)

Modifier 24 denials cost practices thousands every month. Most are completely preventable if you know what triggers them and build the right workflows to avoid modifier 24 denials systematically.

Top 5 Reasons Modifier 24 Claims Get Denied

Understanding why modifier 24 claim denials happen helps you prevent them. These five reasons account for most rejections:

"Included in global package" is the most common denial reason. Payers default to assuming every visit during the global period relates to surgery unless you prove otherwise. Your documentation must explicitly state the visit is unrelated.

Diagnosis overlap creates immediate red flags. If the ICD-10 codes look similar between the surgery and the E/M visit, automated systems deny first and ask questions later.

Missing the modifier entirely happens more than you'd think. Staff forget to check if the patient had recent surgery. Building alerts into your practice management system catches these before submission.

Pre-Submission Denial Prevention Checklist

Run through this checklist before submitting any claim with Modifier 24:

Before You Submit:

• E/M service is clearly unrelated to prior surgery
• Chief complaint documented as new/separate condition
• Diagnosis code DIFFERENT from surgical diagnosis
• Documentation explicitly states "unrelated" with clinical rationale
• Visit date is within global period (verified)
• Same physician or same specialty group
• Modifier 24 appended to E/M code (not procedure)

Train your billing team to use this checklist every time. Print it out. Laminate it. Post it at every workstation. One missed item means a denial.

How to Appeal a Modifier 24 Denial

When modifier 24 denials happen despite your best efforts, a strong appeal process gets your money back.

Step 1: Review the denial reason code carefully. Different reasons require different appeal strategies.

Step 2: Gather supporting documentation including the operative report, the E/M visit note, and proof of different diagnoses.

Step 3: Write your appeal letter emphasizing the unrelated nature of the visit. Use clear, direct language: "This visit addressed a condition completely separate from the patient's surgery."

Step 4: Include the surgical date, global period dates, and distinct diagnosis codes. Create a timeline showing why the conditions are unrelated.

The key to winning Modifier 24 appeals is demonstrating that the visit would have occurred regardless of the surgery. Make this argument explicitly in your appeal letter.

📉 Tired of fighting denials? MedSole RCM's denial management specialists recover revenue you thought was lost. We handle appeals from start to finish. [See our denial recovery results →]

Medicare vs Commercial Payers: Modifier 24 Rules by Payer Type

If you think every insurance company follows the same rules, you are setting yourself up for a headache. Medicare sets the gold standard, but commercial payers often add their own twists.

What works for modifier 24 Medicare claims might trigger a denial from UnitedHealthcare or Aetna. Your billing team needs to know who is paying the bill before they scrub the claim.

Medicare Modifier 24 Requirements

Medicare is rigid but predictable. They follow the letter of the law in the CMS Claims Processing Manual.

Medicare requires strict adherence to the "same physician" rule. This means any physician in the same group with the same specialty is considered the surgeon. They will deny any claim from a partner without modifier 24 during the global period.

For 2026, CMS modifier 24 audits are heavily automated. Their systems are trained to reject vague documentation. If your diagnosis code isn't specific enough, the claim won't even make it to a human reviewer. Stick to E/M codes only; Medicare will instantly deny modifier 24 on a procedure code.

Commercial Payer Variations

Commercial plans are the wild west. While many follow CMS guidelines, others have proprietary edits that are much stricter.

Commercial payers may have different definitions of "same physician." Some plans treat every doctor in a group as the same entity, regardless of specialty. Others might not recognize the "same specialty" rule at all.

We also see major variations in diagnosis logic. Some commercial plans will pay a modifier 24 claim even with a related diagnosis code, provided the notes are strong. Others will deny it automatically if the diagnosis code matches the surgical claim, no matter what your notes say.

Best Practice: Don't guess. Check the provider manual for your top 5 payers. If they have a specific policy on global periods, print it and tape it to your coder's monitor.

Medicaid Considerations

Medicaid is state-specific, so there is no single rulebook. Generally, they follow CMS guidelines, but local implementations vary.

Some state Medicaid plans are notorious for denying all global period claims and forcing you to appeal with records. It's a "deny first, ask questions later" strategy. Always document as if you are preparing for an audit, because with Medicaid, you often are.

Frequently Asked Questions About Modifier 24

What is modifier 24 used for?

Modifier 24 is used to identify an evaluation and management (E/M) service performed by the same physician during a postoperative global period for a condition completely unrelated to the original surgery. It allows separate reimbursement for legitimate unrelated care that would otherwise be denied as part of the global surgical package.

What is the difference between modifier 24 and 25?

Modifier 24 is for unrelated E/M services during the global period on a different day than surgery. Modifier 25 is for a significant, separately identifiable E/M service on the same day as a procedure. Key distinction: modifier 24 equals different day during global; modifier 25 equals same day as procedure.

Can you bill modifier 24 and 25 together?

Yes, in rare circumstances. This occurs when a patient in a global period presents for an unrelated issue (Modifier 24) and also receives a minor procedure for that new issue requiring a separate E/M (Modifier 25) on the same day. Can we bill modifier 24 and 25 together? Yes, but expect scrutiny.

What is the primary purpose of modifier 24?

The primary purpose of modifier 24 is enabling healthcare providers to receive separate payment for E/M services that address conditions completely unrelated to a recent surgery. Without this modifier, these legitimate services would be denied as part of the global surgical package, causing significant revenue loss.

How do I avoid modifier 24 claim denials?

To avoid denials: Document clearly that the visit is unrelated to surgery. Use a diagnosis code different from the surgical diagnosis. Include an explicit "unrelatedness" statement in your notes. Verify the visit falls within the global period. These steps prevent most modifier 24 denials.

Should modifier 24 or 25 go first?

Modifier 24 should go first. According to AAPC guidance, postoperative modifier 24 should be sequenced before other modifiers because computer systems process global period edits as primary. Format your claim as [E/M Code]-24-25, not -25-24. Incorrect sequencing can trigger unnecessary denials.

What is global period modifier 24?

Global period modifier 24 refers to using Modifier 24 during a procedure's global postoperative period. The global period spans 10 or 90 days after surgery when routine follow-up is included in the surgical fee. Modifier 24 allows billing for unrelated E/M services within this otherwise non-billable window.

Can modifier 24 be used for surgical complications?

No. Surgical complications like wound infections, surgical site reactions, and post-op fever are considered related to surgery and included in the global package. Modifier 24 only applies to conditions completely unrelated to the procedure. Complications require different modifiers or aren't separately billable at all.

Does modifier 24 only apply to E/M codes?

Yes. Modifier 24 applies exclusively to Evaluation and Management codes (99202-99499) and certain eye exam codes. For unrelated procedures during the global period, you'd use Modifier 79 instead. Appending Modifier 24 to procedure codes will result in automatic denial.

What is the difference between modifier 24 and 79?

Modifier 24 is for unrelated E/M services during the global period. Modifier 24 and 79 serve different purposes: 24 covers evaluation and management visits while 79 covers procedures. Think of it simply: 24 equals office visits; 79 equals surgical or therapeutic procedures.

Can a different doctor bill without modifier 24?

If the provider is from a different specialty or different group than the surgeon, they typically don't need Modifier 24. However, if they share the same specialty and group (same tax ID), they're considered the "same physician" and Modifier 24 is required for unrelated visits.

What is the difference between modifier 24 and 57?

Modifier 24 is for unrelated E/M during the global period. Modifier 24 and 57 have distinct uses: Modifier 57 indicates an E/M service that results in the decision to perform major surgery with a 90-day global. Modifier 57 is used on or one day before major surgery.

Does modifier 24 affect reimbursement?

Yes. Without Modifier 24, E/M services during the global period are denied as "included in surgical package." Proper use of Modifier 24 enables separate payment for legitimate unrelated care, protecting your revenue. Missing this modifier means losing payment for valid services you provided.

What documentation is required for modifier 24?

Documentation must include: chief complaint for the unrelated condition, different diagnosis code than surgery, explicit statement that visit is unrelated, history/exam/plan focused on the unrelated condition, and medical necessity for separate evaluation. Missing any element increases denial risk significantly.

What is denial reason 24?

Denial "reason 24" typically refers to claims denied because the service is considered part of the global surgical package. This occurs when Modifier 24 is missing, documentation is insufficient, or the diagnosis appears related to surgery. It's one of the most common denial reasons for post-operative visits.

Mastering Modifier 24: Your Path to Cleaner Claims and Better Revenue

Modifier 24 represents one of the most misunderstood opportunities in medical billing. We've covered the essentials: how to identify unrelated E/M services during global periods, when to use and avoid the modifier, documentation requirements that satisfy payers, and critical 2026 compliance updates. Each element matters for protecting your revenue.

Practices that correctly identify and bill Modifier 24 opportunities recover thousands in revenue that would otherwise disappear into the global surgical package. Every unrelated visit during a patient's post-op period is potential income you've earned. Missing these opportunities or using the modifier incorrectly costs real money.

We understand that modifiers are just one of hundreds of details demanding your attention. You became a healthcare provider to help patients, not to decode CMS billing rules.

Let MedSole RCM Handle Your Modifier Complexity

Our certified coding specialists review every claim for modifier accuracy, ensuring you capture every dollar you've earned. With MedSole RCM, you get:

✅ 99% first-pass clean claims rate for modifier-related submissions
✅ Dedicated specialty coders who understand your clinical workflows
✅ 2026-compliant processes updated with every CMS change
✅ Denial management that recovers revenue others leave behind

[Schedule Your Free Billing Assessment →]

Discover how much revenue you're missing. No obligation, no pressure—just insights.