Posted By: Medsole RCM
Posted Date: Oct 16, 2025
Understanding cpt code 99214 shouldn’t feel like a daily fight, yet most providers say it does. You manage complex patients, review labs, adjust meds, interpret outside notes—real moderate-level work—while still worrying whether the visit truly qualifies. That uncertainty pushes many clinicians to pick 99213 “just to be safe,” even when the care delivered deserves more. The result is predictable: lost revenue, inconsistent coding, and lingering fear of audits.
The real issue isn’t skill. It’s clarity. What counts as moderate MDM? How should time be documented? When do telehealth and modifier rules change the picture?
This guide removes the guesswork. You’ll learn exactly when 99214 applies, how to document it quickly, and how to protect your revenue without changing how you treat patients.
Revenue Reality Check
Most clinics lose between $20,000 and $80,000 per year by reporting moderate-complexity visits as 99213 rather than accurately invoicing CPT code 99214.
In simple terms, cpt code 99214 is an established patient visit where you are doing more than a quick check-in. You are thinking through change. You are weighing options, reviewing data, and updating the plan because the situation is no longer routine.
You reach a 99214 level 4 visit when the patient makes you pause and reassess. Maybe control is slipping, new symptoms appear, or test results do not match the story. Whenever you need to reconsider risk, safety, or next steps, the visit typically qualifies as 99214 work.
A follow-up moves beyond 99213 when you manage more than a stable problem. Examples include rising blood pressure, a higher A1c, new shortness of breath, or mood changes. If you are actively solving a problem rather than simply confirming stability, you are in 99214 vs 99213 territory.
Medication decisions often serve as the decisive factor. Starting, stopping, or changing a drug requires judgment and follow-up. You are balancing benefits, side effects, and interactions. That level of risk and monitoring usually matches the 99214 description and deserves to be coded that way.
Chronic disease does not need to be critical to reach moderate complexity. A trend in the wrong direction, more frequent flares, or growing uncertainty about control is enough. If you are tightening the plan, adding testing, or shortening follow-up, the visit typically qualifies for cpt code 99214.
|
Code |
History & Exam |
MDM Level |
Time (2025) |
Typical Scenarios |
Reimbursement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
99213 |
Medically appropriate |
Low complexity |
20–29 min |
Predictable follow-ups, stable chronic issues, routine refills |
Lower |
|
99214 |
Medically appropriate |
Moderate complexity |
30–39 min |
Two+ chronic conditions, med adjustments, new symptoms requiring workup |
Mid-range |
|
99215 |
Medically appropriate |
High complexity |
40–54 min |
High-risk medications, rapid worsening, extensive decision-making |
Highest |
Providers do not code cpt code 99214 because visits are long. They code it because the visit demands deeper judgment, problem-solving, and clinical risk management. Below are specialty-specific triggers that reliably elevate a follow-up beyond a routine 99213.
A follow-up becomes moderate complexity when you must reassess stability or adjust management. Common triggers:
Any symptom that requires ruling out cardiac ischemia or worsening control qualifies:
Threshold situations often include:
Moderate complexity occurs whenever metabolic control requires intervention:
Neurological symptoms are high-risk by nature:
Below are precise, realistic examples written exactly the way a provider thinks.
Each reflects the required criteria: problems, data, risk, and why it qualifies.
Problems: Two chronic diseases with worsening control
Data reviewed: A1c trend, renal panel, outside blood pressure logs
Risk level: Medication changes + risk of progression
Why it qualifies: You are analyzing multiple data points, revising medications, and adjusting follow-up due to rising risk.
Problems: New symptom with potentially serious differential
Data reviewed: ECG, prior cardiology notes, medication list
Risk level: Possible cardiac pathology; new testing ordered
Why it qualifies: You are evaluating risk, ordering diagnostic testing, and determining safe next steps—clear moderate complexity.
Problems: Two psychiatric conditions with suboptimal control
Data reviewed: PHQ-9, GAD-7, therapy notes, past medication response
Risk level: Dose change + monitoring for side effects or worsening symptoms
Why it qualifies: Psychiatric medication adjustments almost always meet moderate risk when combined with ongoing symptoms.
Problems: Chronic condition with new symptoms
Data reviewed: TSH, Free T4, liver panel, prior labs
Risk level: Medication titration, follow-up labs needed
Why it qualifies: You are interpreting abnormal results and modifying therapy based on data and clinical risk.
Problems: Neurologic symptoms with unclear etiology
Data reviewed: MRI report, prior ER documentation, labs
Risk level: Potential red-flag condition + diagnostic uncertainty
Why it qualifies: Neurological evaluation and coordination of imaging place this visit securely at the 99214 level.
|
Question |
Yes/No |
|---|---|
|
Did you manage two or more chronic conditions today? |
|
|
Did you interpret or review labs, imaging, or outside records? |
|
|
Did you start, stop, or change a prescription medication? |
|
|
Did the patient present new symptoms requiring differential diagnosis? |
|
|
Did your plan involve moderate clinical risk or closer follow-up? |
|
|
Did you spend 30–39 minutes reviewing, evaluating, counseling, documenting, or coordinating care? |
If two or more are checked, the visit almost always qualifies for cpt code 99214 under MDM or time.
Choosing cpt code 99214 based on time is often easier than judging complexity. In 2025, CMS made it clear: if your total same-day physician or qualified provider time reaches 30–39 minutes, the visit qualifies—even when the clinical work feels routine. What matters is the actual cognitive labor you spent managing the patient, not how fast the face-to-face portion went.
CMS includes nearly all medically necessary work performed on the same calendar day, whether or not the patient is in front of you. Providers often underestimate this. The following activities do count:
Every minute of this counts toward the 99214 time requirement 2025.
CMS excludes tasks that are administrative or unrelated to clinical decision-making. These do NOT count toward 99214 time:
Time must be directly tied to patient evaluation, management, or coordination.
|
What Counts Toward Time (✓) |
What Does NOT Count (✗) |
|---|---|
|
Reviewing labs, imaging, consult notes |
Non-clinical admin tasks |
|
Interpreting data trends |
Staff-only activities |
|
Taking history and performing exam |
Time waiting or rooming delays |
|
Counseling, shared decision-making |
Insurance and paperwork tasks |
|
Updating medication list |
Personal breaks or interruptions |
|
Documenting the encounter |
Conversations not related to care |
|
Ordering tests or adjusting therapy |
Work not tied to this visit |
|
Coordinating with specialists |
Calling about unrelated issues |
The Time Rule Most Providers Miss
If you spend 30–39 minutes on the patient’s care—reviewing data, evaluating symptoms, documenting, ordering tests, or coordinating care—you already qualify for cpt code 99214, even when the visit “feels simple.” Time-based coding protects revenue for work you already perform.
Accurate documentation is the backbone of cpt code 99214. In 2025, payers care less about long notes and more about whether your record clearly explains why the visit required moderate complexity. When your reasoning is obvious, billing 99214 becomes safe, compliant, and predictable—even during audits.
For a visit to qualify based on medical decision-making, your documentation should show three things:
1. Problems Addressed
Documenting that you managed multiple chronic conditions, a worsening illness, or a new symptom with potential risk immediately signals moderate complexity. Make sure the note reflects clinical reasoning—not just the diagnosis code.
2. Data Reviewed
Moderate MDM often includes reviewing meaningful data such as labs, home readings, imaging reports, hospital notes, or specialist recommendations. Even a brief explanation like “Reviewed nephrology consult; incorporated recommendations into plan” is enough to show cognitive work.
3. Risk of Management
Any medication changes, new prescriptions, therapy adjustments, or follow-up testing automatically raise the visit’s risk. Documenting these choices—especially the why—cements the visit firmly in 99214 territory.
|
Clinical Area |
Provider-Friendly Documentation Phrase |
|---|---|
|
Problem Complexity |
“Managing two chronic conditions today with evidence of progression.” |
|
Data Review |
“Reviewed and interpreted labs and recent specialist note to adjust treatment.” |
|
Medication Change |
“Adjusted medication due to uncontrolled symptoms and clinical risk.” |
|
Risk Assessment |
“New prescription requires monitoring for potential adverse effects.” |
|
Follow-Up Coordination |
“Coordinated follow-up with cardiology due to elevated clinical risk.” |
|
Shared Decision-Making |
“Discussed risks and benefits of treatment options; patient agreed to plan.” |
|
Chronic Condition Review |
“Disease stability uncertain; ordered additional tests to guide management.” |
|
Plan Justification |
“Treatment modified based on trend analysis of home monitoring logs.” |
Even when the visit is truly moderate complexity, documentation errors can downgrade it. Here’s what usually goes wrong:
Audit-Proofing Your 99214 in Seconds
A simple line such as:
“Medication changed due to uncontrolled A1c and rising clinical risk.”
Instantly supports moderate risk, especially when paired with chronic disease management. Auditors look for clarity, not length. A short sentence often protects thousands of dollars in revenue.
Telehealth continues to qualify for cpt code 99214 in 2025, but only when providers follow strict modifier and POS rules. The medical complexity is often clear—the denials come from coding mechanics, not from your clinical work. When your documentation shows moderate MDM or 30–39 minutes of total same-day time, the visit meets 99214 criteria. The only remaining risk is billing errors.
Most payers—including Medicare, large commercial plans, and many Medicaid programs—still allow 99214 via telemedicine as long as:
Many providers undercode telehealth visits as 99213 out of caution, even when the workload clearly supports cpt code 99214—especially with chronic disease management, medication adjustments, or reviewing significant data.
Telehealth billing in 2025 depends heavily on the modality. Here’s the simplest provider-first breakdown:
Audio-Video Visits (Most Common)
Use:
Audio-video is accepted by nearly all payers for 99214.
Audio-Only Visits
Rules vary widely:
Provider takeaway: Always check payer sheets monthly—audio-only rules change more than any other policy.
The majority of telehealth 99214 denials come from incorrect POS, not documentation.
Here’s the clean breakdown:
|
POS Code |
Where Patient Is Located |
When to Use |
|---|---|---|
|
POS 10 |
Patient at home |
Most common for 99214 telehealth in 2025 |
|
POS 02 |
Outside home (clinic, facility, workplace) |
When home is NOT the originating site |
Using POS 11 (office) on a virtual visit triggers denials automatically—even if the note is perfect.
Use this quick provider filter before submitting:
Checking these boxes prevents >90% of telehealth denials.
The Real Reason Telehealth Claims Get Rejected
Most telehealth denials are NOT clinical.
They happen because of incorrect modifiers, missing POS codes, or payer-specific telehealth rules—not because the visit failed to meet cpt code 99214 requirements. A clinically perfect note can still be denied if the billing mechanics don’t match payer rules.
Modifiers determine the approval or denial of a 99214 claim. Even when your documentation explicitly indicates moderate MDM or a duration of 30–39 minutes, selecting an incorrect modifier may result in immediate rejection. These regulations apply to Medicare, Medicaid, and most commercial plans, ensuring that proper adherence protects both revenue and compliance.
Use 99214-25 when you perform a minor procedure and a separately identifiable evaluation and management service on the same day.
A clean rule for providers:
If you addressed a new problem, changed medications, reviewed labs, or made decisions that go beyond routine pre- and post-procedure care, you must add modifier 25.
Correct examples:
If the E/M is simply part of the procedure’s routine work, do not use modifier 25.
Use 99214-95 for real-time audio-video telemedicine visits that meet 99214 complexity or time requirements.
Pair it correctly:
Modifier 95 is required by most payers to validate that the visit met live interactive standards.
You will not use these often, but when you do, they protect the claim from automatic denials.
Modifier 24 – Unrelated E/M During Post-Op
Use 99214-24 when you see a patient during their post-operative period for a problem not related to the surgery.
Example:
A patient had cataract surgery last week but now presents for uncontrolled diabetes. This E/M visit is unrelated and requires modifier 24.
Modifier 57 – Decision for Major Surgery
Use 99214-57 when the visit results in the decision to perform a major surgery (90-day global period).
Example:
New symptoms + decision to schedule gallbladder surgery → add modifier 57.
Modifier 93 – Audio-Only Telehealth
Use 99214-93 for payers that allow moderate-complexity audio-only visits, when documentation shows:
Not all payers allow this, so always confirm.
|
Clinical Situation |
Correct Modifier |
Why |
|---|---|---|
|
Minor procedure + separate identifiable E/M |
25 |
Visit includes additional complexity beyond procedure |
|
Telehealth (audio-video) |
95 |
Required by most payers for live video |
|
Telehealth (audio-only, payer allows) |
93 |
Distinguishes telephone-only service |
|
Post-op period, unrelated condition |
24 |
Condition unrelated to surgery |
|
Decision for major surgery made during visit |
57 |
Signals decision-to-operate encounter |
|
In-office visit, no procedure, no telehealth |
No modifier |
Standard 99214 |
Comprehending the reimbursement process for CPT code 99214 in 2025 is crucial for safeguarding your revenue. Even when clinical procedures meet criteria for moderate complexity, numerous clinics continue to utilize lower codes—thereby decreasing revenue without altering patient care. This section examines Medicare reimbursement, the influence of RVUs on payment, and the impact of payer composition on your clinic’s financial landscape.
Medicare’s national average reimbursement for cpt code 99214 in 2025 sits around $126–$130 depending on region, locality adjusters, and GPCI values.
This rate applies whether the visit is in-person or telehealth (if all requirements are met).
Providers typically earn:
A single undercoded follow-up visit may look small, but across hundreds of encounters each month, the financial impact becomes substantial.
The value of rvu 99214 is determined by three RVUs:
|
RVU Component |
2025 Approx. Value |
Meaning |
|---|---|---|
|
Work RVU |
~1.92 |
Cognitive effort + medical decision-making |
|
Practice Expense RVU |
1.37–1.60 (facility vs non-facility) |
Supplies, staff time, overhead |
|
Malpractice RVU |
0.11 |
Risk associated with the encounter |
Total RVUs generally land between 3.40 and 3.60, multiplied by the 2025 Medicare Conversion Factor to calculate reimbursement.
This RVU structure is why moderate-complexity visits produce significantly higher reimbursement—and why undercoding directly reduces revenue.
Even with identical clinical workloads, two clinics may generate significantly different revenues solely due to variations in payer mix.
Examples:
Precise identification of moderate-complexity visits enables providers to establish predictable and sustainable revenue streams across all payer categories.
|
Payer Type |
Average Reimbursement |
Notes |
|---|---|---|
|
Medicare (2025) |
$126–$130 |
Based on locality + conversion factor |
|
Commercial Insurance |
$145–$200+ |
Typically 115–160% of Medicare |
|
Medicaid |
$65–$85 |
Varies widely by state |
|
Telehealth (Medicare) |
Same as in-person |
Requires modifier 95 + correct POS |
|
Telehealth (Commercial) |
100–140% of Medicare |
Payer-specific policies |
Most Clinics Miss 30–40% of Eligible 99214s
Most clinics undercode 30–40% of eligible cpt code 99214 visits without realizing it—missing tens of thousands of dollars every year for work they’re already doing.
Accurate documentation and understanding of payer rules convert that lost value into predictable revenue without increasing clinical workload.
Even experienced providers lose revenue on cpt code 99214 because of avoidable mistakes. Most errors aren’t clinical—they happen at the documentation and coding level. This section breaks down the issues that lead to denials, downcoding, or missed revenue, and gives you clear ways to prevent them.
Many providers default to 99213—even when the visit meets moderate complexity—because they’re worried the payer will question it. In reality, payers care about logic, not volume. If your assessment, plan, and decision-making clearly show moderate risk or medical work, 99214 is appropriate and fully defensible. Undercoding quietly drains thousands in revenue each year without reducing audit exposure.
The opposite problem happens when the visit “felt complex,” but the note doesn’t show the reasoning. Missing medication changes, absent data review, or vague plans make payers downcode instantly. A concise note that connects problems → data → risk → plan is the safest way to support 99214 billing.
Most telehealth denials have nothing to do with clinical work. Providers lose reimbursement because of:
A strong telehealth workflow fixes these issues immediately and keeps telehealth 99214 claims clean.
Many providers forget they only need one valid path to 99214:
The mistake happens when the note shows 32 minutes of total work, but the provider still codes 99213 because the visit “felt simple.” If your total time qualifies, you have already met the 99214 threshold under 2025 CMS rules.
|
Common Issue |
What to Correct |
Instant Fix for Providers |
|---|---|---|
|
Undercoding due to audit fear |
Missing link between assessment & plan |
Add one line showing decision logic (“Medication adjusted due to BP trend”) |
|
Overcoding without support |
Vague documentation |
Show data reviewed + risk addressed in the plan |
|
Telehealth denials |
Wrong POS or modifier |
Video? Use Modifier 95 + POS 02/10 |
|
Time vs MDM confusion |
Forgetting time counts |
If total time = 30–39 min, 99214 is valid |
|
Missing risk justification |
No explanation for med changes |
Document why the change matters (“Risk of hypoglycemia—dose reduced”) |
|
Weak follow-up plan |
No next steps |
Add clear follow-up instructions (labs, return visit, monitoring) |
These real-world cases show providers exactly when cpt code 99214 applies, why the visit qualifies as moderate complexity, and what documentation should look like. No competitor provides specialty-specific examples with this level of clarity. This is where we win ranking, trust, and engagement.
What happened:
A 56-year-old patient with long-standing hypertension reports new intermittent chest pressure. BP elevated. Needs ECG, medication adjustment, and risk counseling.
Why this qualifies as 99214:
Recommended documentation phrase:
“New chest pressure with elevated BP. Reviewed prior 3-month BP readings, ordered ECG, adjusted lisinopril dose due to risk of cardiac complications. Close follow-up arranged in 1 week.”
What happened:
Follow-up visit for multiple chronic conditions. A1c trending upward. eGFR decreasing. Needs insulin titration and nephrology coordination.
Why this qualifies as 99214:
Recommended documentation phrase:
“Reviewed A1c trend and nephrology note. eGFR decline noted. Adjusted insulin regimen; reinforced renal-protective BP goals. Follow-up labs in 4 weeks.”
What happened:
Patient reports poor SSRI response and sleep disturbance. PHQ-9 score increased. Provider switches antidepressant and adds short-term sleep aid.
Why this qualifies as 99214:
Recommended documentation phrase:
“PHQ-9 increased from 13→18. Poor response to SSRI with insomnia. Switched to SNRI, added short-term sleep aid, safety plan reviewed. Follow-up in 2 weeks.”
What happened:
Patient reports unilateral arm numbness and new headaches. Neuro exam abnormal. Needs MRI, labs, and close follow-up.
Why this qualifies as 99214:
Recommended documentation phrase:
“New unilateral numbness + headache. Neuro exam abnormal. Ordered MRI brain + metabolic labs. Educated patient on red-flag symptoms requiring ER visit.”
What happened:
Patient with coronary artery disease reports new exertional dyspnea. Needs medication adjustment, diagnostic testing, and risk counseling.
Why this qualifies as 99214:
Recommended documentation phrase:
“Reviewed prior stress test + ECG. Worsening dyspnea on exertion—possible progression of CAD. Adjusted beta-blocker dose, ordered echocardiogram.”
What happened:
Thyroid labs show abnormal TSH/T4 levels. Patient has new palpitations and fatigue. Dose adjustment needed.
Why this qualifies as 99214:
Recommended documentation phrase:
“Abnormal TSH/T4 with palpitations and fatigue. Reviewed last 3 lab sets, adjusted levothyroxine dose, arranged repeat labs in 6 weeks.”
What happened:
Child with known asthma presents with increased wheezing and nighttime symptoms. Needs step-up therapy and monitoring plan.
Why this qualifies as 99214:
Recommended documentation phrase:
“Moderate asthma flare with nighttime symptoms. Reviewed symptom diary, increased ICS dose, added spacer teaching, follow-up in 1 week.”
Most providers don’t intentionally undercode. It happens because follow-ups feel routine even when the work behind them isn’t. When you look at your recent schedule through the lens of criteria for billing 99214, you usually find dozens of visits that met the E/M code 99214 rules but were billed lower.
This mini-audit helps you see, in less than 60 seconds, how much complexity you manage every single day—and how often that complexity supports cpt code 99214 without adding work or stress. The goal isn’t to increase coding levels; it’s to match your documentation to the actual clinical effort you already provide.
Check all that apply from your last 20 patient visits.
|
Mini-Audit Criteria |
Yes / No |
Why It Matters |
|---|---|---|
|
2+ chronic conditions managed at the same visit |
⬜ |
This usually triggers moderate complexity because the care plan requires more thinking, risk balancing, and data review. |
|
Any medication started, stopped, or adjusted |
⬜ |
Medication management alone can qualify a visit for cpt code 99214 due to moderate risk. |
|
Review of outside data (labs, notes, imaging, consults) |
⬜ |
Reviewing or reconciling external data counts toward moderate MDM. |
|
Visit required 30–39 minutes of total same-day work |
⬜ |
Time alone qualifies the visit for e m code 99214 under 2025 rules. |
|
A worsening chronic condition or new symptom investigated |
⬜ |
Progression or new symptoms elevate problem complexity. |
|
Coordination with specialists, follow-up planning, or care transitions |
⬜ |
These tasks increase cognitive load and support moderate MDM. |
Documentation Insight:
Most providers don’t miss 99214 because of medical complexity — they miss it because their note doesn’t clearly connect problems, data, and risk. A single clarified assessment can shift an encounter into accurate, compliant moderate MDM.
Most providers aren’t missing cpt code 99214 because of clinical judgment—they’re missing it because no one has ever helped them translate real-world complexity into clean, compliant documentation. MedSole RCM fixes that without asking you to extend visits, add steps, or change the way you care for patients. We simply bring structure to the work you’re already doing.
Our approach focuses on protecting your revenue while keeping your workflows familiar and efficient.
Support Insight:
Most practices leave thousands in compliant 99214 revenue unclaimed each month—not from lack of care, but from lack of support. Smart, simple structure retrieves that revenue without increasing your workload.
Talk to our billing experts today for a no-pressure 99214 claim review.
After auditing thousands of E/M encounters across primary care and specialty practices, our billing team has seen one consistent truth: most providers are doing the clinical work of a cpt code 99214 visit far more often than they realize. The gap rarely comes from medical decision-making—it comes from how busy documentation hides that complexity.
Our guidance is simple: anchor every visit in clinical logic. If you changed medication, reviewed outside records, adjusted the care plan, or spent meaningful time coordinating care, the note already carries the elements of moderate MDM. You are not “upcoding”—you’re accurately reflecting the work you performed.
Clear documentation protects you, strengthens your reimbursement, and ensures your patients receive the continuity of care they deserve. Think of this guide as the structure behind what you’re already doing every day.
If you ever feel unsure, remember you’re not alone—our team is here to help interpret payer rules, support your documentation, and keep your revenue secure.
1. What is the difference between 99213 and 99214?
99213 is for straightforward, consistent follow-ups with minimal decision-making. CPT code 99214 is used for visits in which you are managing several problems, adjusting treatment, or examining relevant data. If the visit "feels heavier" than a routine check-in, it typically falls under 99214.
2. What is the time requirement for CPT Code 99214 in 2025?
In 2025, 99214 is supported if you spend 30-39 minutes caring for that patient on the same day. This comprises chart review, documentation, test ordering, counseling, and coordination, in addition to face-to-face contact.
3. What qualifies as moderate medical decision-making (MDM)?
Moderate MDM occurs when you manage numerous illnesses, modify medications at risk, analyze external data, or order tests that affect your plan. If actual consideration and risk balancing are required, you're typically in 99214 territory.
4. Can nurse practitioners or physician assistants bill 99214?
Yes. NPs and PAs can bill 99214 if their note indicates mild MDM or 30-39 minutes of work. Just make sure to follow each payer's monitoring or incident-to guidelines.
5. Can CPT 99214 and 99396 be billed together?
They can be billed simultaneously if the problem-solving appointment is distinct and important from the preventive exam. In that scenario, add modifier 25 to 99214 and fully document any additional effort.
6. Does a 99214 visit require a full review of systems (ROS)?
No. ROS should only be medically appropriate, not exhaustive. The main driver of cpt code 99214 is moderate MDM or 30-39 minutes, not how many boxes you check in ROS.
7. Can you bill 99214 and a procedure on the same day?
Yes, if the E/M work is separate from the technique. Document the evaluation properly, and apply modifier 25 to 99214 so that the payer recognizes it as a separate service.
8. Can CPT 99496 and 99214 be billed together?
Typically, no. 99496 (TCM) already includes an E/M service, thus most payers bundle a same-day 99214. Only bill for both if the 99214 visit is unrelated and your documentation clearly shows that.
9. Can CPT 99214 and G2211 be billed together?
Yes. G2211 should be used when providing continuing, relationship-based therapy for chronic conditions and no procedures are performed that day. It assists in recognizing the additional cognitive labor involved in longitudinal management.
10. What is the average Medicare reimbursement for 99214 in 2025?
Most clinics will receive Medicare payments ranging from $115 to $130 for 99214, depending on location. It is still one of the most effective established patient visit codes for income.
11. What are the documentation requirements for CPT 99214?
You must support moderate MDM, which is 30-39 minutes of total time. The note should explain why you changed medications, ordered tests, or were worried about risk.
12. Can 99214 be billed for telehealth in 2025?
Yes. 99214 is chargeable for audio-video visits with modifier 95 and POS 02 or 10. Modifier 93 may be required for audio-only content, although coverage is determined by each payer's rules.
13. Can CPT 99214 and 90833 be billed together?
Yes. 99214 covers medical management, while 90833 covers psychotherapy add-on time. Simply separate the therapeutic segment and record the time and content properly.
14. What is the CPT description of 99214?
CPT 99214 refers to an established patient office or outpatient visit that requires significant medical decision-making or 30-39 minutes of clinician time. In real life, it's the visit where you're truly dealing with intricacy.
15. What are the criteria for billing 99214 in 2025?
A visit qualifies if it includes moderate MDM or 30–39 minutes of overall effort. If your paperwork demonstrates why the visit required that amount of thought or time, 99214 is supported.
Mastering cpt code 99214 isn’t about adding more to your plate—it’s about capturing the value of the work you’re already doing. When moderate complexity is documented clearly and time is counted correctly, your clinic gains stronger reimbursement, fewer denials, and cleaner compliance across every payer. Most providers miss eligible 99214 visits simply because the rules feel unclear, not because the care isn’t there.
If you want support tightening documentation, reducing audit stress, or recovering undercoded revenue, MedSole RCM can help you quietly in the background—no pressure, no disruption to your workflow.
Recent Blogs
Posted Date: Jun 24, 2025
Posted Date: Jun 26, 2025
Posted Date: Jun 28, 2025
Posted Date: Jun 30, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 02, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 04, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 07, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 09, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 11, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 14, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 16, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 18, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 22, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 23, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 25, 2025
Posted Date: Jul 28, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 01, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 04, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 06, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 08, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 11, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 14, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 18, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 20, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 25, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 27, 2025
Posted Date: Aug 29, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 03, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 05, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 08, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 15, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 18, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 22, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 24, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 26, 2025
Posted Date: Sep 29, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 02, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 13, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 16, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 23, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 27, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 28, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 30, 2025
Posted Date: Oct 31, 2025
Posted Date: Nov 03, 2025
Posted Date: Nov 05, 2025
Posted Date: Nov 11, 2025
Posted Date: Nov 14, 2025